Phys. Rev. Lett. Phys. Rev. A Phys. Rev. B Phys. Rev. C Phys. Rev. D Phys. Rev. E Phys. Rev. ST AB Rev. Mod. Phys. Phys. Rev. (Series I) Phys. Rev. Volume: Page/Article:

Phys. Rev. B 56, 6047–6055 (1997)

[Issue 10 – 1 September 1997 ]

[ Previous article | Next article | Issue 10 contents ]

Interfacial alloying and interfacial coupling in Cr/Fe(001)

M. Freyss, D. Stoeffler, and H. Dreyssé

Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, 23, rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg Cedex, France

The magnetic order of Cr layers on Fe(001) is studied taking into account interfacial alloying and possible interdiffusion. The interfacial alloy is modeled by either a one-monolayer or a two-monolayer ordered compound whose concentration is varied. The spin-polarized electronic structure is determined self-consistently by solving a d-band tight-binding Hamiltonian. We determine the concentration for which the phase of the layer-by-layer antiferromagnetic structure of Cr changes in the Cr film on Fe(001). We find that in the case of two interfacial mixed layers, a pi phase shift occurs at a Cr concentration between 33% and 50% when three monolayers (ML) of Cr are deposited. The occurrence of this pi phase shift changes to a concentration between 11% and 25% for a more important coverage of Cr (namely 11 ML). When only one mixed layer is considered, the phase of the antiferromagnetic stacking of Cr changes at a concentration between 25% and 33% for 3 ML of Cr and between 33% and 50% for 11 ML of Cr. A simulation of the variation of the magnetization during Cr growth shows that the more Cr and Fe are interdiffused at the interface, the more important is the decrease of the magnetization. We compare our results to the many experimental data available.

©1997 The American Physical Society

URL: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v56/p6047
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.6047
PACS: 75.30.Pd, 75.70.Cn, 75.70.Ak

[ Previous article | Next article | Issue 10 contents ]

References

1. P. Bruno and C. Chappert, Phys. Rev. B 46, 261 (1992).
2. S. Mirbt, A. M. N. Niklasson, B. Johansson, and H. L. Skriver, Phys. Rev. B 54, 6382 (1996).
3. J. Unguris, R. J. Celotta, and D. T. Pierce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1125 (1991).
4. B. Heinrich et al., in Magnetic Ultrathin Films: Multilayers and Surface/Interfaces and Characterization, edited by B. T. Jonker et al., MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 313 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1993), p. 119.
5. D. Stoeffler and F. Gautier, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 101, 139 (1990); J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 121, 259 (1993).
6. F. Herman, J. Sticht, and M. van Schilfgaarde, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4783 (1991).[ SPIN][ INSPEC]
7. D. Venus and B. Heinrich, Phys. Rev. B 53, R1733 (1996).
8. P. J. Schurer, Z. Celinski, and B. Heinrich, Phys. Rev. B 51, 2506 (1995).
9. A. Davies et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4175 (1996).
10. R. Pfandzelter, T. Igel, and H. Winter, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4496 (1996).
11. C. Turtur and G. Bayreuther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1557 (1994).
12. G. Bayreuther and S. Miethaner, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 148, 42 (1995).[ INSPEC]
13. S. Miethaner and G. Bayreuthe (private communication).
14. I. Turek, J. Kudrnovský, M. Sob, V. Drchal, and P. Weinberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2551 (1995).
15. D. Stoeffler, A. Vega, H. Dreyssé, and C. Demangeat, in Magnetic Ultrathin Films, Multilayers, and Surfaces, edited by A. Fert et al., MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 384 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1995), p. 247.
16. D. Stoeffler and F. Gautier, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 147, 260 (1995).[ INSPEC]
17. D. Stoeffler and F. Gautier, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 121, 259 (1993).[ INSPEC]
18. D. Stoeffler, Ph.D. thesis, Strasbourg, 1992.
19. R. Coehoorn, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 151, 341 (1995).[ INSPEC]
20. M. Freyss, D. Stoeffler, and H. Dreyssé, Phys. Rev. B 54, R12677 (1996).

[ Previous article | Next article | Issue 10 contents ]

[ Home  | Browse  | Search  | Subscriptions  | Help  ]