APS Journals Homepage Physical Review Online Archive Homepage Contact Information Online Journal Help Physical Review Online Archive Homepage Browse Available Volumes Search Members Subscription Information What's New in PROLA?
Volume: Page/Article:

Article Collection: View Collection  Help (Click on the Check Box to add an article.)

Phys. Rev. B 30, 36–43 (1984)

[Issue 1 – 1 July 1984 ]

Previous article | Next article | Issue 1 contents ]

Add to article collection View Page Images or PDF (1601 kB)


Interface magnetism in metals: Ag/Fe(001)

S. Ohnishi*
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201 and Fundamental Research Laboratory, NEC Corporation, 1-1 Miyazaki 4-chome, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 213, Japan
M. Weinert
Department of Physics, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973
A. J. Freeman
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201
Received 24 February 1984

A study of the effect of an ordered overlayer of Ag on the magnetism of an Fe(001) surface is presented. In order to understand the changes induced at the Ag/Fe interface, a series of self-consistent spin-polarized local-spin-density calculations were carried out with the use of our allelectron, full-potential, linearized augmented-plane-wave method. While the charge density is found to approach the bulk value within approximately one layer of the interface, the spin density at the interface is found to be strongly perturbed. An enhancement of the Fe magnetic moment at the interface (to 2.52 µB/atom) is predicted which, however, is significantly less than that found for the clean Fe(001) surface (2.95 µB). The role of the Ag overlayer in delocalizing the Fe surface states responsible for the increased surface magnetization and the effect on the single-particle spectra is described and discussed. The effect of the surface and interface on the contact hyperfine fields is evaluated: The (negative) core-polarization contribution is found to scale with the moment, but the valence contribution changes sign from negative in the interior to positive at the surface. The physical basis and the relationship of these results to the interpretation of Mössbauer-effect measurements of the hyperfine field are described.

©1984 The American Physical Society

URL: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v30/p36
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.36


* Present address.

Add to article collection View Page Images or PDF (1601 kB)

Previous article | Next article | Issue 1 contents ]


References

(Reference links marked with dot may require a separate subscription.)
  1. G. Bayreuther, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 38, 273 (1983) and references therein [dot INSPEC].
  2. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965) ; U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972) [dot INSPEC].
  3. M. Weinert, J. Math. Phys. 22, 2433 (1981) [dot SPIN][dot INSPEC].
  4. E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981) .
  5. D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 662 (1979) .
  6. L. N. Liebermann, D. R. Fredkin, and H. B. Shore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 539 (1969) .
  7. G. Waller and U. Gradmann, Phys. Rev. B 26, 6330 (1982) ; E. Tamura and R. Feder, Solid State Commun. 44, 1101 (1982) [dot INSPEC].
  8. S. Ohnishi, A. J. Freeman, and M. Weinert, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6741 (1983) .
  9. D. Nagle, H. Frauenfelder, R. D. Taylor, D. R. F. Cochran, and B. T. Matthias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 364 (1960) .
  10. A. J. Freeman and R. E. Watson, in Magnetism, edited by G. T. Rado and H. Suhl (Academic, New York, 1965), Vol. II A, p. 167.
  11. J. Tyson, A. H. Owens, J. C. Walker, and G. Bayreuther, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2487 (1981) [dot SPIN][dot INSPEC].
  12. M. Weinert and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6262 (1983) .
  13. L. Hedin and B. I. Lundqvist, J. Phys. C 4, 2064 (1971) [dot INSPEC].
  14. V. S. Fomenko, in Handbook of Thermionic Properties, edited by E. G. V. Samsanow (Plenum, New York, 1966), p. 20.
  15. R. J. Weiss and A. J. Freeman, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 147 (1959).
  16. C. G. Shull and H. A. Mook, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 184 (1966) .
  17. M. Weinert and A. J. Freeman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 38, 23 (1983) [dot INSPEC].
  18. G. Bayreuther and G. Lugert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 35, 50 (1983) [dot INSPEC].
  19. A. M. Turner, Y. J. Cheng, and J. L. Erskine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 348 (1982) ; A. M. Turner and J. L. Erskine, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5628 (1983) .
  20. D. A. Shirley, Adv. Chem. Phys. 23, 85 (1972).
  21. D. J. Joyner, O. Johnson, and D. M. Hercules, J. Phys. F 10, 169 (1980).
  22. C. Binns, C. Norris, I. Lindau, M. L. Shek, B. Pate, P. M. Stefan, and W. E. Spicer, Solid State Commun. 43, 853 (1983) [dot INSPEC].
  23. J. R. Leite, J. C. Rodrigues, A. C. Ferraz, and A. C. Pavao, Phys. Rev. B 16, 978 (1977) .
  24. E. Wimmer, A. J. Freeman, and H. Krakauer (unpublished).
  25. P. W. Anderson and A. M. Clogston, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 6, 124 (1961); and,, 124 (1961).
  26. M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954) ; T. Kasuya, Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45 (1956); K. Yosida, Phys. Rev. 106, 893 (1957) .


Add to article collection View Page Images or PDF (1601 kB)

[Show Articles Citing This One] Requires Subscription

Previous article | Next article | Issue 1 contents ]








[ APS   |   APS Journals   |   PROLA Homepage   |   Browse   |   Search ]