|
|
|
||
| 65 of 122 |
![]() |
This Document | ||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
SummaryPlus | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
Full Text + Links | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
PDF (267 K) | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Actions | ||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Cited By | ||||
![]() |
Save as Citation Alert | ||||
![]() |
E-mail Article | ||||
![]() |
Export Citation | ||||
![]() |
|||||
Dynamics in submonolayer Fe-films
M. Sladecek
,
, a, B. Sepiola, J. Koreckib, c, T. Slezakb, c, R. Rüfferd, D. Kmieca and G. Vogla
a Institut für Materialphysik der Universität Wien, Strudlhofgasse 4, A-1090, Wien, Austria
b Faculty of Physics and Nuclear Techniques, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, Pl-30-059, Cracow, Poland
c Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, PAS, Cracow, Poland
d ESRF, F-38043, Grenoble, France
Available online 19 June 2004.
The properties of thin films are directly connected with the atomic structure. At elevated temperatures this structure is determined by atomic dynamics. Pronounced effects are expected for thin films of low coverage. We have investigated electronic and dynamical properties of a submonolayer Fe film on a W(1 1 0) substrate with nuclear resonance scattering (NRS) in grazing–incidence geometry. This atomistic technique is best suited for such investigations due to its element (isotopic) and submonolayer sensitivity as demonstrated in the model system of Fe/W(1 1 0). A simple relaxation model was used to explain the temperature dependence of the NRS spectra. The relaxation rates and diffusion coefficients have been calculated.
Author Keywords: X-ray scattering, diffraction, and reflection; Diffusion and migration; Surface diffusion; Epitaxy; Mössbauer spectroscopy; Iron; Tungsten; Vicinal single crystal surfaces
) and the RT measurement after the highest temperature 670 K (&z.cirf;). The shape of the spectrum remains without change after and between measurements at higher temperatures (Fig. 1). This is a proof of the temperature stability of the sample and the reversibility of the effect shown in Fig. 1. The dashed line demonstrates the natural decay of the excited energy state of the 57Fe nucleus.
1. U. Gradmann, G. Liu, H.J. Elmers and M. Przybylski. Hyperfine Interact. 57 (1990), p. 1845. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document
2. J. Korecki, M. Kubik, N. Spiridis and T. l
zak. Acta Phys. Polonica A 97 (2000), p. 129. Abstract-INSPEC
| $Order Document
3. R. Röhlsberger, J. Bansmann, V. Senz, K.L. Jonas, A. Bettac, O. Leupold, R. Rüffer, E. Burkel and K.H. Meiwes-Broer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), p. 5597. Abstract-Compendex | Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | Full Text via CrossRef
4. R. Rüffer and A.I. Chumakov. Hyperfine Interact. 97–98 (1996), p. 589.
5. B. Sepiol, A. Meyer, G. Vogl, R. Rüffer, A.I. Chumakov and A.Q.R. Baron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996), p. 3220. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | APS full text | Full Text via CrossRef
6. B. Sepiol, A. Meyer, G. Vogl, H. Franz and R. Rüffer. Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998), p. 10433. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | APS full text | Full Text via CrossRef
7. H. Thiess, M. Kaisermayr, B. Sepiol, M. Sladecek, R. Rüffer and G. Vogl. Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001), p. 104305. Full Text via CrossRef
8. M. Sladecek, B. Sepiol, M. Kaisermayr, J. Korecki, B. Handke, H. Thiess, O. Leupold, R. Rüffer and G. Vogl. Surf. Sci. 507–510C (2002), p. 124. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (126 K)
9. R. Röhlsberger, J. Bansmann, V. Senz, K.L. Jonas, A. Bettac, K.H. Meweis-Broer and O. Leupold. Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003), p. 245412. Full Text via CrossRef
10. H. Grünsteudel, V. Rusanov, H. Winkler, W. Meyer-Klaucke and A.X. Trautwein. Hyperfine Interact. 122 (1999), p. 345. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | Full Text via CrossRef
11. G.V. Smirnov. Hyperfine Interact. 123–124 (1999), p. 31. Full Text via CrossRef
12. J. Hauschild, H.J. Elmers and U. Gradmann. Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998), p. R677. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | APS full text | Full Text via CrossRef
13. M. Przybylski. Hyperfine Interact. 113 (1998), p. 135. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | Full Text via CrossRef
14. M. Przybylski and U. Gradmann. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987), p. 1152. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | Full Text via CrossRef
15. M. Przybylski and U. Gradmann. J. Appl. Phys. 63 (1988), p. 3652. Abstract-INSPEC | $Order Document | Full Text via CrossRef
16. J.A. Tjon and M. Blume. Phys. Rev. 165 (1968), p. 456. Full Text via CrossRef
17. S. Dattagupta and K. Schroeder. Phys. Rev. B 35 (1987), p. 1525. Abstract-INSPEC
| $Order Document
| Full Text via CrossRef
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volumes 566-568, Part 1 , 20 September 2004, Pages 372-376 Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Surface Science |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65 of 122 |
| Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. |