Stochastic model of hysteresis
Physical Review E Browse Available Volumes PRE
Quick Search Subscription
Information Online Help
Vol:  Page or Article #:

Article Collection:  View Collection   Help (Click on the COLLECT ARTICLE to add an article.)

[ Previous / Next Abstract | Issue Table of Contents | Bottom of Page ]

Physical Review E (Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics) -- April 2000 -- Volume 61, Issue 4 pp. 3490-3500

Full Text:  [  PDF (734 kB)    GZipped PS    Order Document  ]

Stochastic model of hysteresis

L. Pál
KFKI Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 49, 1525 Budapest, Hungary

(Received 20 May 1999)

The methods of the probability theory have been used in order to build up a model of hysteresis which is different from the well-known Preisach model. It is assumed that the system consists of large number of abstract particles in which the variation of an external control parameter (e.g., the magnetic field) may result in transitions between two states [script S](+) and [script S](–). The state of a particle is characterized by the value +1 or –1 of a random variable (e.g., the magnetization direction parallel or antiparallel to the magnetic field). The transitions are governed by two further random variables corresponding to the [script S](–)==>[script S](+) and the [script S](+)==>[script S](–) transitions (e.g., "up switching" and "down switching magnetic field"). The method presented here makes it possible to calculate the probability distribution and consequently the expectation value of the number of particles in the [script S](+) (or [script S](–)) state for both increasing and decreasing parameter values, i.e., the hysteresis curves of the transitions can be determined. It turns out that the reversal points of the control parameter are Markov points which determine the stochastic evolution of the process. It has been shown that the branches of the hysteresis loop are converging to fixed limit curves when the number of cyclic back-and-forth variations of the control parameter between two consecutive reversal points is large enough. This convergence to limit curves gives a clear explanation of the accommodation process. The accommodated minor loops show the return-point memory property but this property is obviously absent in the case of nonaccommodated minor loops which are not congruent and generally not closed. In contrast to the traditional Preisach model the reversal point susceptibilities are nonzero finite values. The stochastic model can provide a surprisingly good approximation of the Raylaigh quadratic law when the external parameter varies between two sufficiently small values. The practical benefits of the model can be seen in the numerical analysis of the derived equations. On one hand the calculated curves are in good qualitative agreement with the experimental observations and on the other hand, the estimation of the joint distribution function of the up and down switching fields can be performed by using the measured hysteresis curves. ©2000 The American Physical Society

URL: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v61/p3490
PACS: 02.50.Ga, 02.50.Ey, 75.60.Ej        Additional Information

View ISI's Web of Science data for this article: [ Source Abstract  | Citing Articles  | Related Articles  ]


Full Text:  [  PDF (734 kB)    GZipped PS    Order Document  ]

References

Citation links [e.g., Phys. Rev. D 40, 2172 (1989)] go to online journal abstracts. Other links (see Reference Information) are available with your current login. Navigation of links may be more efficient using a second browser window.
  1. I. D. Mayergoyz, Mathematical Models of Hysteresis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).
  2. A. Visintin, Differential Models of Hysteresis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
  3. A. Iványi, Hysteresis Models in Electromagnetic Computation (Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1997).
  4. G. Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism (Academic, San Diego, 1998).
  5. G. Kádár, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 4013 (1987). [SPIN]
  6. G. Kádár, Phys. Scr. T25, 161 (1989). [INSPEC]
  7. F. Preisach, Z. Phys. 94, 277 (1935).
  8. M.A. Krasnoselskii and A.V. Pokrovskii, Sov. Math. Dokl. 12, 1388 (1971).
  9. L. Pál, Foundation of the Probability Calculus and Statistics (Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1995) (in Hungarian), Vol. 1, p. 122.
  10. W.S. Melville, J. Inst. Electron Eng. 97, 165 (1950).
  11. R.O. Carter and D.L. Richards, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 199 (1950).
  12. E. Della Torre and G. Kádár, IEEE Trans. Magn. 23, 2823 (1987). [ISI]
  13. G. Biorci and D. Pescetti, Nuovo Cimento 7, 829 (1958). [ISI]
  14. R. Becker and W. Döring, Ferromagnetismus (Springer, Berlin, 1939) (in German), p. 222.
  15. G. Kádár and E. Della Torre, IEEE Trans. Magn. 23, 2820 (1987).
  16. After the first submission of this manuscript a very interesting paper was published: [G. Bertotti, I.D. Mayergoyz, V. Basso, and A. Magni, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1428 (1999)] about the functional integration approach to hysteresis over an abstract probability space of Kolmogorov. This approach is different from that which is described in present paper and has certainly a much wider field of possible applications. [ISI]

Full Text:  [  PDF (734 kB)    GZipped PS    Order Document  ]

[ Previous / Next Abstract | Issue Table of Contents | Top of Page ]


Article Collection:  View Collection   Help (Click on the COLLECT ARTICLE to add an article.)

[ Browse Available Volumes | Search ]
[ Home Page | Online Help | Feedback | Exit ]

© Copyright The American Physical Society