VOLUME 85, NUMBER 16                     P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S                                16 OCTOBER 2000


               Observation of Charge-Density Wave Domains on the Cr(110) Surface
                            by Low-Temperature Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

                                    K.-F. Braun, S. Fölsch,* G. Meyer, and K.-H. Rieder
              Institut für Experimentalphysik, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
                                                     (Received 11 April 2000)
               We have studied the Cr(110) surface with low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy at 6 to
             145 K. For tunneling voltages below 6150 mV we observe a surface charge-density wave (CDW) with
             a wavelength of 42 Å and wave fronts aligned with the [001] in-plane direction. The observed wave
             pattern is identified as the surface projection of the bulk CDW's arising from the spin-density wave
             ground state of Cr with the Q vector parallel to [100] and [010], respectively. The bulk CDW with Q
             parallel to the [001] in-plane direction appears, however, to be strongly suppressed at the Cr(110) surface.

             PACS numbers: 75.30.Pd, 61.16.Ch, 75.30.Fv

  The spin-density wave ground state of the itinerant anti-             The experiments were carried out with a homebuilt ul-
ferromagnet chromium [1,2] is the subject of long-standing           trahigh vacuum (UHV) LT-STM which operated at tem-
scientific interest concerning its fundamental nature and,           peratures between 6 and 300 K. The Cr(110) surface
more recently, its technological implications [2]. Below             was cleaned by extensive Ne1 sputtering and simultaneous
the Néel temperature  TN   311 K  bulk Cr exhibits static            annealing cycles up to 970 K (1 keV,  4 mA). It is known
spin-density waves (SDW) due to wave vector nesting of               from literature that UHV cleaning of Cr surfaces is a
the electron and hole Fermi surfaces [3]. As a result of the         tedious task owing to persistent segregation of bulk con-
nesting condition, the wave vector Q is incommensurate               taminants [18]. In the present case, the applied treatment
with the lattice and may point along any of the three                finally yielded a well-ordered surface with terraces typi-
 100  directions of the bcc Cr lattice. The SDW may be               cally 600 Å in size and segregated contaminants (pre-
either longitudinal (S k Q below TSF) or transversal                 dominantly nitrogen [18]) reduced to an estimated surface
(S   Q above TSF) in character, where S denotes the spin             concentration below  8%. The exemplary STM image
polarization and TSF   123 K is the spin flip transition             in Fig. 1(a) was taken in constant current mode at 6 K
temperature. The SDW is accompanied by a strain wave                 (750 Å 3 560 Å, 1000 MV tunneling resistance, Ut  
and a charge-density wave (CDW) with half the period of              21 V referring to the sample with respect to the tip) and
the SDW [4­7]. As an important issue to technological                shows seven terraces which are separated by monatomic
applications, SDW's play a crucial role in the giant                 steps preferentially aligned with the [001] direction and
magnetoresistance effect [8] in Cr Fe superlattices which            the close-packed  111  direction. The crystallographic ori-
is triggered by oscillatory magnetic coupling across the             entation and the centered rectangular unit cell is inferred
antiferromagnetic Cr spacer layer [9,10]. Up to now,                 from the inset in Fig. 1(a)  20 Å 3 18 Å, 0.1 MV, Ut  
all experimental information available on the structural             10 mV  demonstrating atomic resolution of the Cr(110)
features of SDW's and CDW's in bulk Cr or in thin Cr                 surface. Residual surface contaminants are imaged as de-
films is based on spatially averaging approaches such as             pletions on top of the flat terraces. It is noted that these
neutron [1] and x-ray diffraction [1,2,5­7] or spectro-              contaminants tend to form elongated aggregates which are
scopic techniques [11,12]. In this Letter, we present for            aligned with the close-packed  111  directions within the
the first time a local probe study of CDW's at a Cr sur-             surface plane. Figure 1(b) shows the same surface area
face by low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy                imaged at a reduced tunneling voltage of Ut   210 mV
(LT-STM). We show that the antiferromagnetic (AFM)                   and 10 MV tunneling resistance. Under these conditions,
surface domain structure of Cr can be imaged indirectly              a wavelike surface modulation with a corrugation ampli-
via CDW's accompanying the SDW ground state. Besides                 tude of  0.15 Å is observed which is characterized by a
the recently published work of Scholl et al. [13], this              periodic length of 42 Å and wave fronts aligned with the
is-to our knowledge-the only experimental study to                   [001] direction. The wave pattern persists over the entire
date that gives access to the microscopic domain structure           temperature range investigated; the only effect of tempera-
of an AFM surface on the nanometer scale. The present                ture increase is a successive decrease in corrugation am-
observations are also remarkable in the sense that they              plitude down to  0.05 Å at 145 K. The overall wave
arise from the surface projection of a 3D bulk CDW.                  pattern shows no dispersive behavior (i.e., the wavelength
In contrast, only surface charge-density modulations                 does not change with Ut) and appears to be largely undis-
associated with surface-localized states [14,15] or with             turbed by steps, adsorbates, or segregated surface contami-
CDW's in quasi-1D [16] or 2D layered materials [17]                  nants. Hence, it is not associated with a surface state [19]
have been observed by STM so far.                                    which would show the well known Friedel oscillations.

3500                 0031-9007 00 85(16) 3500(4)$15.00                 © 2000 The American Physical Society



VOLUME 85, NUMBER 16                     P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S                             16 OCTOBER 2000




















                                                                     FIG. 2. Voltage-dependent magnitude of the surface wave in
                                                                     Fig. 1(b) at 6 K; (a) exemplary line scans 190 Å in length
                                                                     taken along  110  at Ut   27 mV (upper curve) and at Ut  
                                                                     2275 mV (lower curve). (b) Mean corrugation amplitude ver-
FIG. 1. (a) STM image taken at 6 K  750 Å 3 560 Å,                   sus Ut measured at constant tunneling resistance (20 MV, black
1000 MV, Ut   21 V  with seven Cr(110) terraces separated            dots) and at constant current (1.6 nA, empty dots). The charge-
by monatomic steps; segregated surface contaminants are              density modulation is strongly enhanced for Ut below 6150 mV
imaged as dark dots. The inset  20 Å 3 18 Å, 0.1 MV, Ut              with respect to EF.
10 mV  demonstrates atomic resolution and shows the centered
rectangular surface unit cell. (b) Same area as (a) imaged at re-    value of U
duced sample bias of 210 mV and 10 MV tunneling resistance                         t is increased. In Fig. 2(b) the mean amplitude
                                                                     of the surface wave is shown as a function of U
showing a surface wave with a wavelength of 42 Å and wave                                                                   t mea-
fronts aligned with the [001] direction. The wave pattern is         sured at constant tunneling current (I   1.6 nA, empty
attributed to a surface charge-density modulation arising from       dots) and at a fixed tunneling resistance of 20 MV; see
the bulk CDW's of Cr with Q k  100  and Q k  010 .                   full dots (constant tunneling resistance ensures identical
                                                                     tip-sample distances for different Ut). In both cases the
By varying the sample bias we find that the wave pattern             charge-density modulation is strongly enhanced for Ut be-
shows up for tunneling performed close to the Fermi level            low about 6150 mV and shows a pronounced maximum at
only; its amplitude, on the other hand, is insensitive to the        EF, demonstrating that the corrugation amplitude is solely
tunneling resistance (i.e., the tip-sample distance) which           determined by the tunneling voltage. Hence, the energetic
was varied between 0.1 and 1000 MV. We thus conclude                 range of electronic Cr states contributing to the observed
that the charge-density modulation observed here is not              surface wave is obviously confined to the vicinity of the
due to a topographical modulation of the surface.                    Fermi energy. We interpret this characteristic feature as an
  The voltage-dependent magnitude of the observed wave               unambiguous fingerprint of the CDW accompanying the
pattern indicates that we are dealing with a surface charge-         SDW ground state of Cr which originates from electron
density wave coupled to the well known bulk CDW of Cr.               and hole Fermi surface nesting [3].
This is apparent from Fig. 2 which illustrates the measured            Next, we verify the assignment to a surface-projected
corrugation amplitude of the surface wave for different Ut.          CDW on the basis of known spatial characteristics of the
Figure 2(a) shows two line scans 190 Å in length taken at            bulk CDW in Cr [1,2]. According to neutron and x-ray
6 K along the  110  direction (i.e., perpendicular to the            diffraction data the intrinsic bulk CDW occupies equally
wave fronts). While the modulation is clearly observed               populated domains with the Q vector pointing along any of
at Ut   27 mV with a mean amplitude of  0.16 Å, it is                the three  100  lattice directions. The bulk wavelength is
largely suppressed at Ut   2275 mV. We further find                  temperature dependent and reaches a low-temperature limit
a continuous lateral shift of the modulation as a function           of lbulk   29.5 Å below 20 K [5]. In contrast, the nor-
of the tunneling voltage. Comparison of the line scans in            mal direction of the surface wave fronts shown in Fig. 1(b)
Fig. 2(a) shows that the phase shift relative to the modula-         points along the  110  in-plane direction and the period-
tion measured close to EF approaches p when the absolute             icity length measures 42 Å. This apparent discrepancy is
                                                                                                                              3501



VOLUME 85, NUMBER 16                      P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S                            16 OCTOBER 2000

resolved by the scheme in Fig. 3 which illustrates the wave           shows a constant current topograph  310 Å 3 190 Å,
front arrangement of the three possible bulk CDW domains              18 MV, Ut   20 mV, 135 K  of the related wave pat-
(labeled as A, B, and C) relative to the (110) surface plane.         tern with equidistant wave fronts running along the  110 
For domain A, planar wave fronts with Q k  001  inter-                direction.    For comparison, Fig. 4(b) reproduces the
sect the (110) plane at a distance identical to lbulk. On             dominant surface CDW at the same scale. The crystallo-
the other hand, the wave fronts connected with domains                graphic orientation of images [as indicated in Fig. 4(d)] is
B and C (Q k  010  and Q k  100 ) produce intersection                chosen so that wave fronts of the domain with Q k  001 
lines running along the  001  in-plane direction (see bold
                                     p                                [Fig. 4(a)] are aligned vertically whereas those of the
lines in Fig. 3) with a spacing of 2 lbulk. In the tempera-
                                             p                        dominant domain [Fig. 4(b)] run along the horizontal
ture range from 6 to 145 K the quantity 2 lbulk amounts               direction. At the present measuring temperature, the mean
according to Ref. [5] to 41.7 42.9 Å, which-within the                corrugation of the surface CDW with Q k  001  is about
range of experimental accuracy-agrees very well with                  2 times smaller compared to that found for its dominant
our measured value of 42 Å. The wave pattern observed                 counterpart with Q k  010  and Q k  100 , respectively.
here is thus identified as a surface charge-density modu-             A wave front separation of  30 Å is deduced from
lation induced by the two bulk CDW domains with Q                     Fig. 4(a) which agrees well with the expected value of
pointing either along the [010] or the [100] out-of-plane             lbulk for this domain labeled as A in Fig. 3. It is worth
direction.                                                            noting that for domain A no such voltage-dependent phase
  The major portion of our experimental data reveals sur-             shift is observed as it occurs for domains B and C with
face wave patterns analogous to the exemplary case shown              Q k  010  and Q k  100  [cf. Fig. 2(a)]. Although we
in Fig. 1(b). Hence, the bulk CDW with Q pointing along               cannot yet give a definite physical explanation for the
the [001] in-plane direction (cf. domain A in Fig. 3) ap-             phase shift found for domains B and C, it is reasonable
pears to be largely suppressed at the Cr(110) surface. This           from the point of symmetry that no phase shift occurs for
finding is consistent with x-ray diffraction data on Cr(100)          domain A: In this case, the planar wave fronts of the
[7] and (100)-oriented Cr films [6] which show that CDW               corresponding bulk CDW are oriented perpendicular to
modes with Q oriented within the surface plane are                    the (110) surface plane which preserves mirror symmetry
quenched in the surface-near region. In a few cases,                  with respect to the (001) plane. Figure 4(c) shows a
however, we have also detected a surface charge-density               surface area  990 Å 3 810 Å, 18 MV, Ut   20 mV,
modulation connected with the remaining bulk CDW do-                  135 K) in which the surface CDW with Q k  001  (top
main with Q parallel to the [001] in-plane direction.                 right) coexists with two CDW domains with Q k  010 
There is some indication that this rarely observed sur-               or Q k  100  (left and lower right). As a guide to
face CDW is pinned by defects since it usually occurs                 the eye, respective wave front positions are depicted
in the vicinity of extended step bunches. Figure 4(a)                 schematically by lines in Fig. 4(d). It is remarkable to
                                                                      note that the domain wall width estimated from Figs. 4(c)
                                                                      and 4(d) is within only a few nm. This finding cor-
                                                                      roborates previous ideas concerning domain walls in
                                                                      bulk Cr [20,21]: In the transversal SDW state  S   Q 
                                                                      two spin polarization domains may form for each Q
                                                                      domain. Polarization walls within single Q domains can
                                                                      be moved reversibly by external strain or magnetic fields
                                                                      and exhibit wall widths in the range of 100 nm [20].
                                                                      Walls between SDW domains with different Q, on the
                                                                      other hand, are much harder to move and are expected to
                                                                      be extremely narrow (typically a few lattice constants in
                                                                      width [21]). Our experimental result shows that we are
                                                                      able to verify the latter case by direct spatial observation.
                                                                        To summarize, we have presented evidence that the bulk
                                                                      CDW which accompanies the SDW in Cr gives rise to
                                                                      significant charge-density modulations at the Cr surface.
                                                                      The possibility to study these modulations by LT-STM
FIG. 3. Schematic wave front arrangement of the three pos-            is remarkable for several reasons: First of all, the sur-
sible bulk CDW domains of Cr (labeled as A, B, and C) relative        face domain structure of Cr in its antiferromagnetic SDW
to the (110) surface plane. While planar wave fronts of domain        ground state can be imaged and verified indirectly on the
A  Q k  001   intersect the (110) plane at a distance identical
to the bulk wavelength l                                              atomic scale, since the observed wave patterns are specific
                           bulk, the wave fronts connected with
domains B and C (Q k  010  and Q k  100 ) produce intersec-           to the particular bulk CDW domains involved. Second, this
tion lines (bold lines) running along the [001] in-plane direction
                   p                                                  experimental approach allows one to investigate local sur-
with a spacing of 2 lbulk.                                            face phenomena associated with the CDW (and thereby the

3502



VOLUME 85, NUMBER 16                 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S                           16 OCTOBER 2000

                                                              FIG. 4. (a) STM image  310 Å 3 190 Å, 18MV, Ut  
                                                              20 mV, 135 K) showing the surface charge-density modulation
                                                              arising from the bulk CDW domain with Q k  001 ; wave
                                                              fronts run along the  110  direction with a spacing of  30 Å
                                                              (cf. domain A, Fig. 3). For direct comparison, the dominant
                                                              surface CDW is reproduced in (b). (c) 990 Å 3 810 Å surface
                                                              area (18 MV, Ut   20 mV, 135 K) in which the surface
                                                              CDW with Q k  001  (top right) coexists with two dominant
                                                              CDW domains with Q k  100  or Q k  010 , respectively
                                                              (left and lower right). (d) Scheme of respective wave front
                                                              positions extracted from (c). Because of enhanced contrast,
                                                              surface contaminants appear more pronounced in (a) and (c) as
                                                              compared to (b).

                                                              direct observation of the SDW with the help of ferro-
                                                              magnetic STM tips. Apart from these interesting issues,
                                                              our future experiments aim at local spectroscopic mea-
                                                              surements in order to complement the spatially averaged
                                                              spectroscopic information on the SDW ground state of Cr
                                                              available to date [12].
                                                                This research was supported by the Deutsche For-
                                                              schungsgemeinschaft (Sfb 290, TP A5).


                                                                  *Corresponding author.
                                                                   Electronic address: foelsch@physik.fu-berlin.de
                                                               [1] E. Fawcett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 209 (1988), and references
                                                                   therein.
                                                               [2] H. Zabel, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 11, 9303 (1999), and
                                                                   references therein.
                                                               [3] A. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. 128, 1437 (1962).
                                                               [4] C. Y. Young and J. B. Sokoloff, J. Phys. F 4, 1304 (1974).
                                                               [5] D. Gibbs, K. M. Mohanty, and J. Bohr, Phys. Rev. B 37,
                                                                   562 (1988).
                                                               [6] P. Sonntag, P. Bödeker, T. Thurston, and H. Zabel, Phys.
                                                                   Rev. B 52, 7363 (1995).
                                                               [7] J. P. Hill, G. Helgesen, and D. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. B 51,
                                                                   10 336 (1995).
                                                               [8] M. N. Baibich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472 (1988).
                                                               [9] P. Grünberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2442 (1986).
                                                              [10] E. E. Fullerton, S. D. Bader, and J. L. Robertson, Phys.
                                                                   Rev. Lett. 77, 1382 (1996); Z.-P. Shi and R. S. Fishman,
                                                                   Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1351 (1997); A. M. N. Niklasson,
                                                                   B. Johansson, and L. Nordström, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4544
                                                                   (1999).
                                                              [11] J. Meerschaut et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, R5575 (1998).
                                                              [12] J. Schäfer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2069 (1999).
                                                              [13] A. Scholl et al., Science 287, 1014 (2000).
                                                              [14] D. M. Eigler and E. K. Schweizer, Nature (London) 344,
                                                                   524 (1990).
                                                              [15] J. M. Carpinelli, H. H. Weitering, E. W. Plummer, and
                                                                   R. Stumpf, Nature (London) 381, 398 (1996).
                                                              [16] H. W. Yeom et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4898 (1999).
                                                              [17] R. V. Coleman et al., Adv. Phys. 37, 559 (1988).
SDW) of Cr. In this context, it would be promising to         [18] M. Schmid, M. Pinczolits, W. Hebenstreit, and P. Varga,
probe, for example, proximity effects of ferromagnetic de-         Surf. Sci. 377­379, 1023 (1997); 389, L1140 (1997).
                                                              [19] P. E. S. Persson and L. I. Johansson, Phys. Rev. 33, R8814
posits which are expected to alter the magnetic properties         (1986).
of the Cr host. Furthermore, finite-size-mediated changes     [20] A. Hubert, Theorie der Domänenwände in Geordneten
of the CDW in thin Cr films [6] can be studied in detail.          Medien (Springer, Berlin, 1974).
A fascinating, however challenging, goal to achieve is the    [21] E. W. Fenton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 736 (1980).

                                                                                                                           3503